Not true!
reports from Sohu, these data are widely circulated manufacturer reported to the Development and Reform Commission, but also the previous data, the NDRC did not do any independent very doubtful. It is said that this data is also testing organization commissioned by the test manufacturer, but it is just a experimental data, is done in order to apply new models to the competent department of the directory to see, not the same as the actual use of the fuel consumption data, and even fuel consumption must be less than true. In addition the data is not from the Development and Reform Commission, is likely to be spread out from the car manufacturers, the purpose is to promote themselves, and pretentiously dubbed credibility.
view of this, the real fuel consumption is non-existent things. Fortunately, I already feel suspicious, do not care, it really is a spoof of bread.
is bound to cause great car manufacturers adversely affected and undermined the integrity of the entire industry. car prices have been volatile, there is concern product quality, and manufacturers high-sounding promises of commitment to the image and increasing divergence, has been causing consumers trust the car manufacturers continue to decline. specific to the fuel consumption, the ideal fuel consumption and actual fuel consumption falls far short of the ideal fuel consumption or even smaller but in the course of the opposite seems high, so people no longer believe in the ideal fuel consumption, fuel-efficient manufacturers no longer believe in promoting energy conservation, in the car when consumers to consult more people around the car, look into the real fuel consumption, and not simply look at the idealized model parameters on the number of . how people believe that car manufacturers in the future?
Development and Reform Commission as the competent authorities concerned, but also has an inescapable responsibility. fuel consumption should not allow manufacturers to provide their own, organizations must be tested the test results obtained under the uniform standards . that rely on simple data collected is not convincing, but also can not stand the test, there is no reference value. In addition, I believe that the evaluation of the real fuel consumption is not a simple thing, not an ideal fuel for testing in accordance with parties to carry out, such as to take into account different driving conditions, considering the exercise of the vehicle life, even considering the owner's driving habits, the use of various methods of the sampling, not only in the test sites, but also to investigate the actual user, comprehensive reference gives a real fuel consumption value. If, as the person said, only a third party to collect NDRC boring data, then get would be a injustice, not objective, false data, such data do not worth mentioning. I'd suggest the most better investigate the owner, so the result is more realistic.
message thing after another, beginning with eyes nose and say there is clearly and logically, the next day the rumor was out. big brother, so what can not be a stretch, then finished, ah, people have to guess, misleading?
surprise people, but also give us a lesson that is in the fickle car era, what people are unreliable. merchants unreliable, experts unreliable, sitting at home (media) are unreliable, housekeeper (authorities) are unreliable, So the integrity of manufacturers, professional experts, the media's credibility and authority of the competent authorities, all are marked with a question mark.
case, we do not need to care about the real fuel came out, not worth the wait, as car makers and the so-called third-party authorities and are inextricably linked, so the results come out already greatly reduced. Who's fuel consumption and large, less fuel consumption, who, gains and losses Cunxin know, the owner who still believe in their right mind that steelyard.
Disclaimer: I have an exclusive license Sohu car article, reproduced need to specify the source
No comments:
Post a Comment